QFITX vs. TTRZX
QFITX (Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund) and TTRZX (Templeton Global Total Return Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, QFITX returned -1.40%/yr vs -0.06%/yr for TTRZX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFITX charges 1.56%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TTRZX.
Performance
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QFITX achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than TTRZX's 2.21% return.
QFITX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -5.33%
- 1Y
- -5.47%
- 3Y*
- -5.96%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
TTRZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -4.10% | -7.64% | -1.03% | -6.54% | -22.87% | 36.77% | 10.36% | 2.31% |
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 2.21% | 18.26% | -6.61% | 6.28% | -12.29% | -5.14% | -5.58% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFITX and TTRZX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, QFITX and TTRZX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFITX vs. TTRZX — Risk / Return Rank
QFITX
TTRZX
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QFITX | TTRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | 1.43 | -2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | 2.08 | -3.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.27 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.47 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 5.23 | -6.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFITX | TTRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | 1.43 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.48 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFITX drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than TTRZX's maximum drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFITX and TTRZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFITX | TTRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -33.17% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -6.95% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -11.49% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -27.73% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.36% | -8.48% | -28.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.27% | -7.61% | -11.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.95% | +1.92% |
Volatility
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) is 1.60%, while Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that QFITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFITX | TTRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 2.24% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 6.11% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.48% | 7.40% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 9.22% | +11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 7.93% | +12.34% |
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFITX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than TTRZX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFITX vs. TTRZX - Dividend Comparison
QFITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, more than TTRZX's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 13.26% | 12.72% | 3.70% | 0.08% | 0.15% | 29.15% | 2.12% | 4.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 6.92% | 5.57% | 8.19% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 8.18% | 4.84% | 6.96% | 5.55% | 3.54% | 2.94% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFITX and TTRZX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTRZX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to QFITX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFITX dropped -38.03% vs TTRZX's -33.17%.
TTRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QFITX and TTRZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer