QEW vs. XQQI
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QEW is passively managed, while XQQI is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XQQI.
Performance
QEW vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQI
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 17.75% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 14.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and XQQI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QEW vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, smaller than the maximum XQQI drawdown of -13.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and XQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -13.55% | +7.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -5.00% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -2.95% | +1.84% |
Volatility
QEW vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 26.52% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 26.52% | -6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 26.52% | -6.13% |
QEW vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEW vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison
QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XQQI's 8.24% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.11% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 8.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QEW and XQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.
XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.11% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.98% for XQQI.
Find the right allocation for QEW and XQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer