QEW vs. XQQI
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QEW is passively managed, while XQQI is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XQQI.
Performance
QEW vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQI
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and XQQI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QEW | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.75 | 2.97 | +6.78 |
Drawdowns
QEW vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum XQQI drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and XQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -12.53% | +8.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.59% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -2.05% | +1.48% |
Volatility
QEW vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 22.32% | -6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 22.32% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 22.32% | -6.54% |
QEW vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEW vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison
QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and XQQI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.
XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 7.88%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.98% for XQQI.
Find the right allocation for QEW and XQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer