PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QETH vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QETH vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.


QETH

1D
-1.34%
1M
-25.22%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-43.56%
1Y
-32.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
-2.15%
1M
24.08%
YTD
92.48%
6M
89.00%
1Y
171.59%
3Y*
59.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QETH vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
-40.24%-11.44%-3.58%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
92.48%43.11%-7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and SOXQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QETH vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QETH
QETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QETH vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QETHSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.69

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

11.08

-11.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

42.47

-43.33

QETH vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QETH and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QETHSOXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

5.11

-5.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.96

-1.38

Drawdowns

QETH vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QETHSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-46.01%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-15.59%

-47.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.39%

-2.15%

-61.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.76%

-12.95%

-19.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.96%

4.06%

+33.90%

Volatility

QETH vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) is 9.72%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that QETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QETHSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

13.55%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

26.81%

+18.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.40%

33.80%

+34.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.22%

36.38%

+35.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.22%

36.38%

+35.84%

QETH vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QETH vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.26%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


QETH and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to QETH (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -64.07% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 171.59% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 171.59% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.

QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QETH and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer