PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QETH vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QETH vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -36.96% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 72.20% return.


QETH

1D
0.23%
1M
10.30%
6M
-18.57%
YTD
-36.96%
1Y
-49.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.83%

SOXQ

1D
6.53%
1M
-3.45%
6M
53.12%
YTD
72.20%
1Y
117.36%
3Y*
49.65%
5Y*
29.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$441.76K$366.32K$431.82K
$214.44M$218.73M$282.51M

QETH vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
-36.96%-11.44%-5.03%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
72.20%43.11%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and SOXQ is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QETH vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QETH
QETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QETH vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QETHSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.40

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

4.13

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

16.72

-17.79

QETH vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QETH and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QETH vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -67.90%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QETHSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.90%

-46.01%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.90%

-28.56%

-39.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.38%

-16.72%

-44.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-12.93%

-22.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.70%

7.05%

+38.65%

Volatility

QETH vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) is 11.18%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 17.65%. This indicates that QETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QETHSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.18%

17.65%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.43%

37.94%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.86%

43.80%

+23.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.09%

38.40%

+32.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.09%

38.01%

+33.08%

QETH vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QETH vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.30%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


QETH and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to QETH (11.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -67.90% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 117.36% vs -49.13% for QETH. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QETH has been the lower-risk option at 11.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 117.36% return vs -49.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.

QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QETH and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer