PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QETH vs. CBOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QETH vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.02% return.


QETH

1D
-1.34%
1M
-25.22%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-43.56%
1Y
-32.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOO

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QETH vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QETH and CBOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QETH vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QETH
QETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QETH vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QETHCBOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

QETH vs. CBOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QETHCBOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-1.17

+0.75

Drawdowns

QETH vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and CBOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QETHCBOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-2.34%

-61.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.39%

-1.70%

-61.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.76%

-1.61%

-31.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.96%

Volatility

QETH vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QETHCBOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.40%

2.14%

+66.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.22%

2.14%

+70.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.22%

2.14%

+70.08%

QETH vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

QETH vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QETH and CBOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.

CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.

QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.69% for CBOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QETH and CBOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer