PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QETH vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QETH vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -36.96% return, which is significantly lower than BTC's -26.67% return.


QETH

1D
0.23%
1M
10.30%
6M
-18.57%
YTD
-36.96%
1Y
-49.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.83%

BTC

1D
0.60%
1M
4.49%
6M
-15.95%
YTD
-26.67%
1Y
-44.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.83M$40.30M$54.51M
$441.76K$366.32K$431.82K

QETH vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
-36.96%-11.44%2.08%
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-26.67%-7.50%41.93%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and BTC is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024

0.82

The correlation between QETH and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QETH vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QETH
QETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QETH vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QETHBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.84

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.83

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-1.27

+0.19

QETH vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is comparable to the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QETH and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QETH vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -67.90%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QETHBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.90%

-53.30%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.90%

-53.30%

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.38%

-48.89%

-12.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-19.50%

-15.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.70%

34.87%

+10.83%

Volatility

QETH vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 8.13%. This indicates that QETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QETHBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.18%

8.13%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.43%

33.02%

+10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.86%

44.32%

+22.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.09%

47.45%

+23.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.09%

47.45%

+23.64%

QETH vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QETH vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither QETH nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QETH and BTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QETH has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to BTC (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -67.90% vs BTC's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, BTC leads with -44.13% vs -49.13% for QETH. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTC has performed better with a -44.13% return vs -49.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

QETH and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.15% for BTC.

QETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QETH and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer