PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Index ETF (QEBL.TO) and Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF (MGB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEBL.TO achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than MGB.TO's -0.53% return.


QEBL.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.87%
6M
0.85%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.64%

MGB.TO

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-0.28%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.10%
ALL TIME*
1.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$42.28KCA$34.97KCA$32.97K
CA$47.19KCA$42.10KCA$41.42K

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QEBL.TO
Mackenzie Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Index ETF
2.09%12.49%9.72%12.50%-4.47%-9.10%1.38%2.04%
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
-0.53%4.03%2.83%6.86%-11.24%-2.92%8.47%0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QEBL.TO and MGB.TO is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QEBL.TO
QEBL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QEBL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEBL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEBL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QEBL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEBL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MGB.TO
MGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Index ETF (QEBL.TO) and Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF (MGB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEBL.TOMGB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.05

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

0.48

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

1.03

+2.08

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEBL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the MGB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEBL.TO and MGB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEBL.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, which is greater than MGB.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEBL.TO and MGB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEBL.TOMGB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.20%

-17.54%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-3.39%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-4.25%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-16.67%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.46%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-4.12%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.57%

+0.51%

Volatility

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Index ETF (QEBL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF (MGB.TO) at 1.69%. This indicates that QEBL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEBL.TOMGB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

1.69%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

4.49%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

5.80%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.20%

7.37%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.64%

7.07%

+3.57%

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEBL.TO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MGB.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEBL.TO vs. MGB.TO - Dividend Comparison

QEBL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than MGB.TO's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
3.69%4.33%4.74%4.62%6.10%3.08%2.00%2.99%4.07%2.77%2.06%
QEBL.TO
Mackenzie Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Index ETF
5.30%5.45%4.83%22.34%4.45%4.64%4.65%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEBL.TO and MGB.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QEBL.TO is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QEBL.TO is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MGB.TO.

QEBL.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while MGB.TO is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for QEBL.TO and 0.55% for MGB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEBL.TO and MGB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer