QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO).
QDX.TO and MGRW.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDX.TO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2018. MGRW.TO is an actively managed fund by Mackenzie. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020.
Performance
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.63% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.66% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 9.56% |
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | -2.32% | 18.19% | 21.41% | 15.35% | -9.30% | 13.37% | 7.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDX.TO achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than MGRW.TO's -2.32% return.
QDX.TO
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- —
MGRW.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -2.32%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDX.TO
MGRW.TO
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDX.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.85 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.50 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 6.48 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDX.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.96 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.08 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDX.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than MGRW.TO's 1.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.82% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% |
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | 1.94% | 1.84% | 1.93% | 2.28% | 2.44% | 1.77% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, which is greater than MGRW.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and MGRW.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDX.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.08% | -17.20% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -9.38% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.00% | -17.20% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -6.60% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -3.45% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.18% | +0.75% |
Volatility
QDX.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) at 3.65%. This indicates that QDX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGRW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDX.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 3.65% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 7.07% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 11.14% | +5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 10.43% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 10.37% | +5.06% |