PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVY.DE achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than UEF7.DE's 1.61% return.


QDVY.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
0.88%
6M
0.12%
1Y
-1.37%
3Y*
-0.58%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*

UEF7.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.61%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVY.DE
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
0.88%-11.19%9.21%2.97%7.53%8.93%-8.09%6.69%5.99%-2.13%
UEF7.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.61%-4.75%10.53%2.47%-0.50%7.33%-4.28%10.28%4.90%-2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2017

0.89

The correlation between QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVY.DE
QDVY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QDVY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

UEF7.DE
UEF7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UEF7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEF7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEF7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UEF7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEF7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVY.DEUEF7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.08

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.75

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

1.88

-2.47

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVY.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the UEF7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVY.DEUEF7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

0.46

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.43

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.42

-0.15

Drawdowns

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVY.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, roughly equal to the maximum UEF7.DE drawdown of -15.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVY.DEUEF7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-15.39%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-3.32%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-9.67%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.81%

-10.70%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.65%

-5.28%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-4.76%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.33%

+1.30%

Volatility

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF7.DE) at 0.79%. This indicates that QDVY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEF7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVY.DEUEF7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.79%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

3.60%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.84%

5.41%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

6.97%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.71%

6.97%

+0.74%

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVY.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UEF7.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVY.DE vs. UEF7.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEF7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDVY.DE
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%2.90%5.61%1.50%0.57%1.75%2.94%2.20%0.47%0.00%0.00%
UEF7.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.65%5.78%4.66%3.27%1.45%1.52%2.84%2.76%2.24%2.19%1.99%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for UEF7.DE.

QDVY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5, while UEF7.DE tracks Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QDVY.DE and 0.16% for UEF7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVY.DE and UEF7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer