QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE
QDVY.DE (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF) and DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVY.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5, while DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVY.DE returned 4.99%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for DBXJ.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVY.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DBXJ.DE.
Performance
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVY.DE achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBXJ.DE's 14.92% return.
QDVY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXJ.DE
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.04% | -6.57% | 12.71% | 2.90% | 7.46% | 9.00% | -8.10% | 6.74% | 5.86% | -15.81% |
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 14.92% | 12.58% | 13.75% | 16.43% | -12.41% | 9.99% | 5.08% | 21.75% | -9.54% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVY.DE and DBXJ.DE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.12 |
The correlation between QDVY.DE and DBXJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVY.DE
DBXJ.DE
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.14 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 10.03 | -5.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVY.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.19%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVY.DE and DBXJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.19% | -51.22% | +32.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -10.21% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.29% | -16.95% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.29% | -19.01% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -7.08% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -14.55% | +7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 3.20% | -1.88% |
Volatility
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) is 1.50%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that QDVY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 6.54% | -5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 16.25% | -11.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 19.90% | -13.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 16.83% | -8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.01% | 16.44% | -7.43% |
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVY.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while DBXJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.61% | 5.18% | 5.89% | 5.61% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.75% | 2.94% | 2.20% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVY.DE and DBXJ.DE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
QDVY.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBXJ.DE is Japan Equities. QDVY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5, while DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QDVY.DE and 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVY.DE and DBXJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer