PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist (QDVW.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF Inc (FGEQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVW.DE achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than FGEQ.DE's 10.59% return.


QDVW.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
5.59%
YTD
15.14%
6M
15.74%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*

FGEQ.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.00%
YTD
10.59%
6M
10.31%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist
15.14%10.76%16.43%13.08%-1.82%26.14%-9.19%26.51%-3.61%3.76%
FGEQ.DE
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF Inc
10.59%7.21%17.89%14.06%-6.11%32.67%-0.32%31.45%-3.70%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2017

0.91

The correlation between QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVW.DE
QDVW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
QDVW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FGEQ.DE
FGEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FGEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FGEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist (QDVW.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF Inc (FGEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVW.DEFGEQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

4.06

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.30

16.40

+1.90

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the FGEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVW.DEFGEQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.31

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.89

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.74

+0.01

Drawdowns

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVW.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum FGEQ.DE drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVW.DEFGEQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-34.40%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-5.80%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-19.87%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-19.87%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.12%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-3.85%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.44%

+0.11%

Volatility

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist (QDVW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF Inc (FGEQ.DE) at 2.36%. This indicates that QDVW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVW.DEFGEQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.36%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

7.37%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

10.19%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

13.04%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

14.76%

-1.03%

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FGEQ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVW.DE vs. FGEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than FGEQ.DE's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGEQ.DE
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF Inc
1.80%1.90%2.24%2.77%2.81%2.13%2.29%2.11%2.41%1.51%
QDVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.15%2.37%2.52%2.85%3.04%2.63%3.05%3.02%3.25%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVW.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVW.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGEQ.DE.

QDVW.DE is categorized as Global Equity Income, while FGEQ.DE is Global Equities. QDVW.DE tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index USD, while FGEQ.DE tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QDVW.DE and 0.40% for FGEQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVW.DE and FGEQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer