PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
2.92%16.78%11.26%-2.12%-12.39%6.97%6.67%19.37%-0.52%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-6.44%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%35.67%-15.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's -6.44% return.


QDVS.DE

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
2.92%
6M
7.01%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVS.DE
QDVS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.03

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.56

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.16

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.71

7.74

+2.97

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVS.DE and NQSE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.03

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.49

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.67

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between QDVS.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVS.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-37.67%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-11.87%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-37.67%

+12.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.36%

-8.83%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-8.72%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.31%

-0.59%

Volatility

QDVS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 5.83%. This indicates that QDVS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDVS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

5.83%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

12.28%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

19.88%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

20.89%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

21.60%

-2.99%