QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE).
QDVS.DE and H4Z3.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDVS.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. It was launched on Jul 11, 2016. H4Z3.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. Both QDVS.DE and H4Z3.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 2.92% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -7.33% |
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 5.27% | 18.60% | 13.73% | 4.66% | -6.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z3.DE's 5.27% return.
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z3.DE
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 24.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z3.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVS.DE
H4Z3.DE
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVS.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.86 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.76 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 10.11 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVS.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVS.DE and H4Z3.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVS.DE nor H4Z3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, which is greater than H4Z3.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and H4Z3.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVS.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -18.86% | -17.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -10.47% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -8.69% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -5.11% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.86% | -0.14% |
Volatility
QDVS.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) have volatilities of 7.00% and 7.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDVS.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 7.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 12.89% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 18.25% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 15.21% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 15.21% | +3.40% |