QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE
QDVR.DE (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XZMU.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - QDVR.DE tracks the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels while XZMU.DE tracks the MSCI USA Low Carbon SRI Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVR.DE returned 12.24%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for XZMU.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZMU.DE.
Performance
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVR.DE achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than XZMU.DE's 8.21% return.
QDVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
XZMU.DE
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 23.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVR.DE iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.85% | -0.76% | 20.30% | 20.26% | -14.38% | 43.66% | 13.50% | 35.53% | -4.80% |
XZMU.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 8.21% | 5.12% | 32.57% | 26.56% | -17.86% | 45.90% | 9.13% | 36.81% | -5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVR.DE and XZMU.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QDVR.DE and XZMU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVR.DE
XZMU.DE
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVR.DE | XZMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.16 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 7.62 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVR.DE | XZMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.84 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.89 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.87%, roughly equal to the maximum XZMU.DE drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVR.DE and XZMU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVR.DE | XZMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.87% | -33.82% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -10.82% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | -24.76% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.91% | -24.76% | +0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -5.40% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 3.07% | -0.89% |
Volatility
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) at 3.08%. This indicates that QDVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZMU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVR.DE | XZMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.08% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 8.87% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 12.73% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 16.23% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 17.89% | -1.55% |
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMU.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVR.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVR.DE nor XZMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVR.DE and XZMU.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZMU.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVR.DE.
QDVR.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while XZMU.DE tracks MSCI USA Low Carbon SRI Leaders. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVR.DE and 0.15% for XZMU.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVR.DE and XZMU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer