PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) and Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVR.DE achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than DJAM.DE's 8.12% return.


QDVR.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
6.37%
YTD
14.85%
6M
15.24%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*

DJAM.DE

1D
1.22%
1M
5.73%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVR.DE
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.85%-0.76%20.30%20.26%-14.38%43.66%13.50%35.53%1.82%8.55%
DJAM.DE
Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist
8.12%2.01%21.39%11.90%-2.34%31.92%-1.77%28.23%-0.54%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.88

The correlation between QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVR.DE
QDVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DJAM.DE
DJAM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DJAM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) and Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVR.DEDJAM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.77

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

9.22

+1.07

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DJAM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVR.DEDJAM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.70

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.76

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.62

+0.27

Drawdowns

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.87%, smaller than the maximum DJAM.DE drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVR.DEDJAM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-47.32%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.34%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-21.15%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.91%

-21.15%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-7.81%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.21%

-0.03%

Volatility

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist (DJAM.DE) at 2.87%. This indicates that QDVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJAM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVR.DEDJAM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.87%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

8.34%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

11.93%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

14.07%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.09%

+0.25%

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DJAM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVR.DE vs. DJAM.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DJAM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJAM.DE
Lyxor Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF Dist
0.73%0.79%1.17%1.06%1.80%1.11%1.62%1.25%1.90%1.71%2.26%2.44%
QDVR.DE
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJAM.DE.

QDVR.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while DJAM.DE tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVR.DE and 0.50% for DJAM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVR.DE and DJAM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer