PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVL.DE achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SYBS.DE's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVL.DE has underperformed SYBS.DE with an annualized return of 0.93%, while SYBS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 1.57% annualized return.


QDVL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.79%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
0.93%

SYBS.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.74%
YTD
2.27%
6M
2.80%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.99%2.86%4.05%4.32%-3.50%-0.47%0.63%0.88%-0.67%0.12%
SYBS.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.27%1.99%6.20%11.12%-23.36%4.01%2.32%17.50%-4.05%0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.24

The correlation between QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBS.DE
SYBS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SYBS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVL.DESYBS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.91

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

2.21

+6.69

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the SYBS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.18%, smaller than the maximum SYBS.DE drawdown of -32.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVL.DESYBS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-32.65%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.80%

-3.90%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.80%

-7.54%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.91%

-32.65%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.18%

-32.65%

+24.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.25%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-8.21%

+7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

1.49%

-1.28%

Volatility

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) is 0.55%, while SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBS.DE) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that QDVL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYBS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVL.DESYBS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

1.52%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

5.52%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71%

6.93%

-5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.03%

9.54%

-7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.10%

9.63%

-6.53%

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVL.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SYBS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVL.DE vs. SYBS.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than SYBS.DE's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.94%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%0.00%
SYBS.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.53%4.50%4.01%3.29%2.96%2.21%2.49%2.40%2.75%3.14%3.40%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SYBS.DE.

QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI, while SYBS.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for QDVL.DE and 0.20% for SYBS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVL.DE and SYBS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer