PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (D5BG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVL.DE achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than D5BG.DE's 0.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDVL.DE having a 0.90% annualized return and D5BG.DE not far ahead at 0.93%.


QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.74%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%

D5BG.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.57%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-3.63%-0.34%0.56%0.80%-0.61%0.14%
D5BG.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.58%3.14%4.22%7.44%-12.98%-1.39%2.51%6.25%-1.42%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2016

0.50

The correlation between QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

D5BG.DE
D5BG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
D5BG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (D5BG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVL.DED5BG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.12

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.74

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

2.53

+6.46

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the D5BG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVL.DED5BG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.63

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.02

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.20

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Drawdowns

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.22%, smaller than the maximum D5BG.DE drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVL.DED5BG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-17.22%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

-2.68%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

-2.68%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.90%

-17.22%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

-17.22%

+9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.97%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-2.88%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.78%

-0.56%

Volatility

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) is 0.34%, while Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (D5BG.DE) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that QDVL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D5BG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVL.DED5BG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

1.16%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

2.72%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18%

3.13%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

4.49%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.86%

4.64%

-1.78%

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVL.DE vs. D5BG.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while D5BG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
D5BG.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI, while D5BG.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVL.DE and D5BG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer