QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE
QDVK.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - QDVK.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary while XDWS.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVK.DE returned 12.66%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for XDWS.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVK.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWS.DE.
Performance
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVK.DE achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDWS.DE's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVK.DE has outperformed XDWS.DE with an annualized return of 12.66%, while XDWS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.
QDVK.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 0.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVK.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.11% | -5.11% | 38.60% | 38.90% | -33.82% | 35.49% | 20.84% | 31.88% | 3.58% | 7.42% |
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 4.43% | -3.34% | 12.56% | -1.53% | -0.06% | 22.38% | -1.96% | 25.94% | -5.88% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVK.DE and XDWS.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVK.DE and XDWS.DE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVK.DE
XDWS.DE
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVK.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.10 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -0.20 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVK.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | -0.07 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.44 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, which is greater than XDWS.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVK.DE and XDWS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVK.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.28% | -22.95% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.65% | -8.78% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.81% | -11.90% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.28% | -12.47% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.28% | -22.95% | -14.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -7.60% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -5.04% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 4.34% | +0.65% |
Volatility
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) at 5.00%. This indicates that QDVK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVK.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 5.00% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 10.01% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 12.06% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 11.35% | +10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 12.19% | +8.43% |
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVK.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVK.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVK.DE nor XDWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVK.DE and XDWS.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
QDVK.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary, while XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVK.DE and 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVK.DE and XDWS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer