PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVK.DE achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than 36BB.DE's -2.32% return.


QDVK.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
12.66%

36BB.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDVK.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.11%-5.11%38.60%38.90%-33.82%35.49%20.84%2.82%
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.32%-5.30%22.34%32.38%-29.45%27.78%25.24%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.96

The correlation between QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVK.DE
QDVK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

36BB.DE
36BB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVK.DE36BB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

0.28

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

0.77

+1.23

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the 36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVK.DE36BB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.26

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.23

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Drawdowns

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, which is greater than 36BB.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVK.DE36BB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-35.03%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.65%

-15.07%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.81%

-27.35%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.28%

-32.92%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

-11.48%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-10.96%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

5.59%

-0.60%

Volatility

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that QDVK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVK.DE36BB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

4.81%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

12.73%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

16.71%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

19.44%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

20.85%

-0.23%

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVK.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVK.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36BB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.91%0.89%1.01%0.99%1.43%0.77%1.30%0.28%
QDVK.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for 36BB.DE.

QDVK.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary, while 36BB.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Discretionary. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVK.DE and 0.18% for 36BB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVK.DE and 36BB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer