PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVI.DE vs. CGVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF (QDVI.DE) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVI.DE is traded in EUR, while CGVV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CGVV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVI.DE achieves a 43.32% return, which is significantly higher than CGVV's 17.61% return.


QDVI.DE

1D
-2.14%
1M
-4.08%
6M
36.82%
YTD
43.32%
1Y
72.94%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*

CGVV

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.93%
6M
11.82%
YTD
17.61%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDVI.DE and CGVV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.59

The correlation between QDVI.DE and CGVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVI.DE
QDVI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QDVI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CGVV
CGVV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CGVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CGVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF (QDVI.DE) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVI.DECGVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.29

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.52

3.15

+7.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.54

11.38

+27.16

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is higher than the CGVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVI.DE and CGVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.94%, which is greater than CGVV's maximum drawdown of -7.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVI.DE and CGVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVI.DECGVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.94%

-7.35%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.35%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

-0.81%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-1.31%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.03%

-0.14%

Volatility

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF (QDVI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) at 3.31%. This indicates that QDVI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVI.DECGVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

3.31%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

9.91%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

13.49%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

13.30%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

13.30%

+5.60%

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVI.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CGVV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVI.DE vs. CGVV - Dividend Comparison

QDVI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QDVI.DE and CGVV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVI.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVI.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGVV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVI.DE and 0.33% for CGVV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVI.DE and CGVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer