QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE
QDVH.DE (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds - QDVH.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials while XDWF.DE tracks the MSCI World Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVH.DE returned 11.95%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for XDWF.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVH.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWF.DE.
Performance
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVH.DE achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than XDWF.DE's 1.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDVH.DE having a 11.95% annualized return and XDWF.DE not far behind at 11.89%.
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 2.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
XDWF.DE
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -4.21% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | 35.41% | -10.71% | 7.92% |
XDWF.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 1.15% | 15.35% | 34.08% | 12.42% | -4.87% | 39.49% | -11.91% | 29.11% | -13.92% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVH.DE and XDWF.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QDVH.DE and XDWF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVH.DE
XDWF.DE
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVH.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.16 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.29 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 3.98 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVH.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.93 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVH.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.39%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWF.DE drawdown of -42.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVH.DE and XDWF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVH.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.39% | -42.06% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -9.65% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.72% | -19.74% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -19.74% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.39% | -42.06% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -0.84% | -8.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -6.06% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 3.14% | +2.41% |
Volatility
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that QDVH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVH.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.37% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 10.03% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 13.39% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 16.25% | +1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 18.61% | +2.29% |
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVH.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWF.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVH.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVH.DE nor XDWF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QDVH.DE and XDWF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWF.DE.
QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials, while XDWF.DE tracks MSCI World Financials. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVH.DE and 0.25% for XDWF.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVH.DE and XDWF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer