PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVH.DE achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than EXV1.DE's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVH.DE has underperformed EXV1.DE with an annualized return of 11.95%, while EXV1.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


QDVH.DE

1D
3.16%
1M
1.56%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
11.95%

EXV1.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
2.19%
YTD
7.43%
6M
15.31%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
42.40%
5Y*
27.92%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVH.DE
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-4.21%3.01%37.13%8.44%-6.23%48.50%-12.20%35.41%-10.71%7.92%
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
7.43%77.02%32.97%26.28%1.84%37.98%-24.54%15.17%-25.82%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.63

The correlation between QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVH.DE
QDVH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QDVH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EXV1.DE
EXV1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVH.DEEXV1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.31

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

2.55

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

8.70

-8.37

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVH.DEEXV1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

1.85

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.21

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.10

+0.38

Drawdowns

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVH.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.39%, smaller than the maximum EXV1.DE drawdown of -82.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVH.DEEXV1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.39%

-82.30%

+39.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-16.03%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.72%

-20.12%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-28.12%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.39%

-56.14%

+13.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-1.37%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-44.64%

+36.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.71%

+0.84%

Volatility

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) is 4.30%, while iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that QDVH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXV1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVH.DEEXV1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

5.77%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

17.93%

-7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

22.06%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

22.83%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

25.03%

-4.13%

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVH.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EXV1.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVH.DE vs. EXV1.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXV1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
3.59%3.63%5.51%4.53%6.37%1.06%1.52%4.31%4.03%6.01%3.49%3.41%
QDVH.DE
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EXV1.DE.

QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials, while EXV1.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVH.DE and 0.47% for EXV1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVH.DE and EXV1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer