PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDH.DE's -1.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDVG.DE having a 8.96% annualized return and ZPDH.DE not far behind at 8.92%.


QDVG.DE

1D
2.86%
1M
5.53%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.96%

ZPDH.DE

1D
2.83%
1M
5.48%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVG.DE
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.02%1.65%8.47%-1.74%3.30%37.81%1.69%24.75%8.90%7.28%
ZPDH.DE
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
-1.12%1.73%8.46%-1.73%3.31%37.77%1.69%24.37%9.07%6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

1.00

The correlation between QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVG.DE
QDVG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDH.DE
ZPDH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVG.DEZPDH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.21

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

2.95

+0.02

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVG.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.89

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.03

Drawdowns

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDH.DE drawdown of -26.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVG.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-26.61%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-10.77%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-22.64%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-22.64%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.77%

-26.61%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-7.28%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-5.80%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

4.41%

0.00%

Volatility

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVG.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.13%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

10.16%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

14.63%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.47%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

15.77%

0.00%

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVG.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVG.DE nor ZPDH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while ZPDH.DE tracks S&P Health Care Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and ZPDH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer