PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than WELG.DE's -3.60% return.


QDVG.DE

1D
2.86%
1M
5.53%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.96%

WELG.DE

1D
2.97%
1M
4.19%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-3.05%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDVG.DE
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.02%1.65%8.47%-1.74%1.39%
WELG.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-3.60%1.26%7.51%1.94%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVG.DE and WELG.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.94

The correlation between QDVG.DE and WELG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVG.DE
QDVG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

WELG.DE
WELG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WELG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVG.DEWELG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.09

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.55

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

1.29

+1.68

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the WELG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVG.DE and WELG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVG.DEWELG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.47

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.22

+0.26

Drawdowns

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than WELG.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and WELG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVG.DEWELG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-23.11%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-12.38%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-23.11%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-12.09%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-7.24%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

5.34%

-0.93%

Volatility

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVG.DEWELG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.31%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

10.25%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

14.54%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.49%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

13.49%

+2.28%

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELG.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVG.DE vs. WELG.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QDVG.DE
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELG.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
1.55%1.36%0.92%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, QDVG.DE and WELG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELG.DE.

QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while WELG.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.18% for WELG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and WELG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer