QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVG.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVG.DE returned 6.75%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for NQSE.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | -5.44% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 52.10% | -36.29% | 27.37% | 45.23% | 35.67% | -15.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and NQSE.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between QDVG.DE and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
NQSE.DE
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.08 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 10.77 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.28 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.71 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.82 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -37.67% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -11.87% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -22.40% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -37.67% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -0.84% | -6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -8.56% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 3.40% | +1.01% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that QDVG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 4.75% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 11.99% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 16.05% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 20.91% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 21.54% | -5.77% |
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
QDVG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer