QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVG.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for IUSQ.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE has underperformed IUSQ.DE with an annualized return of 8.96%, while IUSQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.65% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 30.14% | -5.97% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVG.DE and IUSQ.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
IUSQ.DE
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.08 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 16.69 | -13.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.31 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.88 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.82 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.76 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -33.60% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -6.48% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -21.25% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -21.25% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | -33.60% | +6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -0.55% | -6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -4.19% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 1.59% | +2.82% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that QDVG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 3.03% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 8.26% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 11.47% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 13.94% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 15.02% | +0.75% |
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
QDVG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer