QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IS3R.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVG.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IS3R.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for IS3R.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IS3R.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than IS3R.DE's 22.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE has underperformed IS3R.DE with an annualized return of 8.96%, while IS3R.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IS3R.DE
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 6M
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
IS3R.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.51% | 8.37% | 37.95% | 8.09% | -13.60% | 24.50% | 16.41% | 31.50% | 0.27% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and IS3R.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVG.DE and IS3R.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
IS3R.DE
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | IS3R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.48 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 13.30 | -10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | IS3R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.84 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.84 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.88 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.85 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum IS3R.DE drawdown of -30.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and IS3R.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | IS3R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -30.77% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -9.01% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -23.57% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -23.57% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | -30.77% | +4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -1.01% | -6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -5.67% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 2.36% | +2.05% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) is 5.24%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that QDVG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | IS3R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.96% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 14.33% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 17.01% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 17.32% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 17.23% | -1.46% |
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3R.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor IS3R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and IS3R.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3R.DE.
QDVG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IS3R.DE is Momentum. QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IS3R.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.25% for IS3R.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and IS3R.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer