QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVG.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for EUNL.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 8.96%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVG.DE and EUNL.DE has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
EUNL.DE
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.40 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.64 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 14.52 | -11.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.12 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.82 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -33.63% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -6.50% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -21.73% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -21.73% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | -33.63% | +6.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -0.31% | -7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -4.25% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 1.64% | +2.77% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that QDVG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 2.62% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 7.72% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 11.16% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 14.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 15.17% | +0.60% |
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
QDVG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer