PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than DDOC.DE's -1.35% return.


QDVG.DE

1D
2.86%
1M
5.53%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.96%

DDOC.DE

1D
4.54%
1M
8.73%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-5.71%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
-5.09%
5Y*
-9.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDVG.DE
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.02%1.65%8.47%-1.74%3.30%30.79%
DDOC.DE
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD
-1.35%-2.99%3.18%-14.12%-25.03%-20.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVG.DE and DDOC.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVG.DE
QDVG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

DDOC.DE
DDOC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVG.DEDDOC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.01

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

0.03

+2.94

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVG.DE and DDOC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVG.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.02

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

-0.39

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.49

+0.97

Drawdowns

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum DDOC.DE drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and DDOC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVG.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-59.88%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-22.33%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-32.67%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-53.96%

+31.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-51.22%

+43.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-41.80%

+36.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

10.98%

-6.57%

Volatility

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) is 5.24%, while Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that QDVG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDOC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVG.DEDDOC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.20%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

14.24%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

20.70%

-6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

24.10%

-9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

24.26%

-8.49%

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DDOC.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVG.DE vs. DDOC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVG.DE nor DDOC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVG.DE and DDOC.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and DDOC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer