PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly higher than XDED.DE's 10.41% return.


QDVF.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.38%
YTD
32.71%
6M
28.30%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
8.97%

XDED.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.95%
1Y
17.77%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
32.71%-2.67%9.20%7.81%
XDED.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D
10.41%-0.44%18.53%10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVF.DE and XDED.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between QDVF.DE and XDED.DE has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVF.DE
QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XDED.DE
XDED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XDED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVF.DEXDED.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.46

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

10.28

-2.30

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the XDED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVF.DE and XDED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVF.DEXDED.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.65

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.90

-0.62

Drawdowns

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than XDED.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and XDED.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVF.DEXDED.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-22.63%

-43.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-5.11%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.13%

-22.63%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.92%

0.00%

-8.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-4.24%

-13.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

1.72%

+3.77%

Volatility

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE) at 2.08%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVF.DEXDED.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

2.08%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

6.76%

+13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

10.72%

+13.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

13.39%

+13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

13.39%

+15.29%

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDED.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVF.DE vs. XDED.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDED.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDED.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D
1.25%1.35%1.61%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVF.DE and XDED.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDED.DE.

QDVF.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XDED.DE is S&P 500. QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while XDED.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.20% for XDED.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and XDED.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer