QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and WDEE.DE (Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while WDEE.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDVF.DE returned 13.74%/yr vs 16.13%/yr for WDEE.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WDEE.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDVF.DE having a 32.71% return and WDEE.DE slightly higher at 33.31%.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
WDEE.DE
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -1.94% |
WDEE.DE Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 33.31% | -2.96% | 9.29% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and WDEE.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QDVF.DE and WDEE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
WDEE.DE
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVF.DE | WDEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.94 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 9.51 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVF.DE | WDEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.69 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than WDEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and WDEE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | WDEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -23.77% | -42.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -12.42% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.13% | -23.77% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -4.37% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -7.19% | -10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 3.85% | +1.64% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.DE) have volatilities of 7.70% and 7.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | WDEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 7.54% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 17.53% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 20.89% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 19.94% | +7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 19.94% | +8.74% |
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WDEE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. WDEE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVF.DE nor WDEE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QDVF.DE and WDEE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WDEE.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while WDEE.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Energy. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.18% for WDEE.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and WDEE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer