QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVF.DE returned 22.92%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for JMLP.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly lower than JMLP.DE's 34.65% return.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- 38.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 30.27%
- YTD
- 34.65%
- 1Y
- 37.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 20.86%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.75% | -2.69% | 9.20% | -3.72% | 72.35% | 68.03% | 0.00% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 34.65% | -5.93% | 40.86% | 9.97% | 28.08% | 44.11% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and JMLP.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between QDVF.DE and JMLP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
JMLP.DE
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVF.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.44 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 9.74 | -4.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.82%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and JMLP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.82% | -22.29% | -43.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -11.02% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.15% | -22.29% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.15% | -22.29% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | 0.00% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -6.39% | -11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 3.89% | +3.09% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 5.30%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 5.30% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.39% | 16.10% | +5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 19.42% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 20.39% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 21.41% | +8.29% |
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.73% | 3.38% | 3.34% | 6.50% | 6.31% | 6.46% | 4.11% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and JMLP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer