QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ISPA.DE (iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while ISPA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE returned 8.97%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for ISPA.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for ISPA.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly higher than ISPA.DE's 13.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDVF.DE having a 8.97% annualized return and ISPA.DE not far ahead at 8.98%.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
ISPA.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 29.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 13.02% | -14.92% | -13.30% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 13.48% | 19.72% | 12.97% | 4.80% | 0.43% | 22.39% | -9.12% | 24.24% | -7.51% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVF.DE and ISPA.DE has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
ISPA.DE
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVF.DE | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.62 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 8.10 | -5.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 28.73 | -20.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVF.DE | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.35 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.91 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than ISPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and ISPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -38.91% | -26.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -3.63% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.13% | -15.10% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | -15.10% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.81% | -38.91% | -26.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -1.09% | -7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -4.46% | -12.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 1.03% | +4.46% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 2.62% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 6.51% | +13.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 8.77% | +15.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 12.00% | +14.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 14.79% | +13.89% |
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 3.75% | 4.52% | 4.89% | 5.91% | 6.92% | 3.32% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 3.37% | 5.66% | 3.64% | 4.35% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
QDVF.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and ISPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer