QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and G1CE.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while G1CE.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVF.DE returned 21.44%/yr vs -3.72%/yr for G1CE.DE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for G1CE.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly lower than G1CE.DE's 36.05% return.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
G1CE.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 36.05%
- 6M
- 37.56%
- 1Y
- 83.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 18.75% |
G1CE.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 36.05% | 27.39% | -22.23% | -13.46% | -25.42% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and G1CE.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between QDVF.DE and G1CE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
G1CE.DE
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (G1CE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVF.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.61 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 7.99 | -5.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 28.31 | -20.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVF.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.88 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | -0.14 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.13 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, roughly equal to the maximum G1CE.DE drawdown of -68.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and G1CE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -68.84% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -10.42% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.13% | -52.75% | +25.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | -68.84% | +41.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -27.70% | +18.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -38.48% | +21.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 2.95% | +2.54% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) is 7.70%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (G1CE.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that QDVF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G1CE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | G1CE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 8.41% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 14.61% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 21.47% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 26.14% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 26.36% | +2.32% |
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than G1CE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. G1CE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVF.DE nor G1CE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and G1CE.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CE.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while G1CE.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.60% for G1CE.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and G1CE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer