QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE returned 7.79%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for AMEE.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AMEE.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 21.96% return, which is significantly lower than AMEE.DE's 26.01% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE has underperformed AMEE.DE with an annualized return of 7.79%, while AMEE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 1Y
- 56.64%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 27.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 21.96% | -2.69% | 9.20% | -3.72% | 72.35% | 68.03% | -40.35% | 13.03% | -14.93% | -13.31% |
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 26.01% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and AMEE.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVF.DE and AMEE.DE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
AMEE.DE
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVF.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 6.15 | -4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 18.33 | -14.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.82%, which is greater than AMEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and AMEE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.82% | -59.14% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -9.17% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.15% | -15.74% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.15% | -19.23% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.82% | -59.14% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.28% | -4.92% | -11.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -10.41% | -7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.58% | 3.08% | +3.50% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) at 5.78%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 5.78% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.92% | 14.72% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.49% | 19.56% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 22.23% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 25.54% | +4.11% |
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVF.DE nor AMEE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and AMEE.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and AMEE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer