PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDVF.DE having a 32.71% return and 5MVW.DE slightly higher at 32.79%.


QDVF.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.38%
YTD
32.71%
6M
28.30%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
8.97%

5MVW.DE

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.30%
YTD
32.79%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.89%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
32.71%-2.67%9.20%-3.70%72.13%67.92%-40.24%5.51%
5MVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
32.79%2.17%7.57%0.01%54.20%52.29%-36.78%4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.97

The correlation between QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVF.DE
QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

5MVW.DE
5MVW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVF.DE5MVW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.97

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

9.81

-1.83

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the 5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVF.DE5MVW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.10

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.45

-0.17

Drawdowns

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than 5MVW.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVF.DE5MVW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-56.87%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-15.05%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.13%

-23.76%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.13%

-23.76%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.92%

-7.49%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-13.53%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

4.56%

+0.93%

Volatility

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE) at 6.76%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5MVW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVF.DE5MVW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

6.76%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

18.33%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

21.33%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

23.99%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

29.20%

-0.52%

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 5MVW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVF.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5MVW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5MVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.48%3.29%3.54%3.64%3.41%3.49%5.08%0.63%
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for 5MVW.DE.

QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while 5MVW.DE tracks MSCI World Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.18% for 5MVW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and 5MVW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer