QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE
QDVE.DE (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) and NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVE.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while NUKL.DE is a Uranium fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDVE.DE returned 28.42%/yr vs 41.91%/yr for NUKL.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NUKL.DE.
Performance
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVE.DE achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than NUKL.DE's 11.67% return.
QDVE.DE
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 20.81%
- 1Y
- 43.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 23.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.61%
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 37.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 18.83% | 10.01% | 46.09% | 34.44% |
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 11.67% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVE.DE and NUKL.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVE.DE
NUKL.DE
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVE.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.21 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.86 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 4.43 | +2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum NUKL.DE drawdown of -37.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVE.DE and NUKL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVE.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -37.52% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -27.12% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | -37.52% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -12.83% | +5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -7.79% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 11.43% | -5.40% |
Volatility
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) is 8.02%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that QDVE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVE.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 11.05% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 28.97% | -13.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 41.82% | -20.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 34.22% | -11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 34.22% | -12.47% |
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVE.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVE.DE nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVE.DE and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
QDVE.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while NUKL.DE is Uranium. QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVE.DE and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVE.DE and NUKL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer