PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (QDVC.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVC.DE achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPYL.DE's 11.37% return.


QDVC.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
4.30%
YTD
8.40%
6M
8.90%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*

SPYL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.37%
6M
11.41%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QDVC.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF
8.40%-3.21%19.27%15.77%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
11.37%4.71%32.33%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.75

The correlation between QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVC.DE
QDVC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QDVC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (QDVC.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVC.DESPYL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.58

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

12.72

-6.93

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVC.DESPYL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.21

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.54

-1.00

Drawdowns

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.76%, which is greater than SPYL.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVC.DESPYL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.76%

-23.27%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-7.13%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.46%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-3.24%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.01%

+0.53%

Volatility

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (QDVC.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) at 2.66%. This indicates that QDVC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVC.DESPYL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.66%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

7.57%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

11.52%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

14.61%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

14.61%

+3.67%

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVC.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVC.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVC.DE nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVC.DE.

QDVC.DE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPYL.DE is S&P 500. QDVC.DE tracks MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weighted, while SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVC.DE and 0.03% for SPYL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVC.DE and SPYL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer