QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE
QDV5.DE (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and OP6E.DE (Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - QDV5.DE tracks the MSCI India while OP6E.DE tracks the Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDV5.DE returned 2.49%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for OP6E.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDV5.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for OP6E.DE.
Performance
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDV5.DE achieves a -11.72% return, which is significantly lower than OP6E.DE's 4.48% return.
QDV5.DE
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -11.72%
- 6M
- -13.23%
- 1Y
- -14.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
OP6E.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDV5.DE iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.72% | -7.96% | 15.56% | 14.91% | -8.16% |
OP6E.DE Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) | 4.48% | 6.39% | 15.17% | 0.41% | -5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDV5.DE and OP6E.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDV5.DE
OP6E.DE
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDV5.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.12 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.13 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 2.95 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDV5.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 0.66 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.36 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDV5.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than OP6E.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDV5.DE and OP6E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDV5.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -18.34% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.83% | -6.72% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -18.34% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.03% | -4.43% | -19.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -4.86% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 2.57% | +6.33% |
Volatility
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) at 2.87%. This indicates that QDV5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OP6E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDV5.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 2.87% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 8.56% | +5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 11.49% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 14.75% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 14.75% | +6.85% |
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDV5.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than OP6E.DE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDV5.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDV5.DE nor OP6E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDV5.DE and OP6E.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OP6E.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OP6E.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QDV5.DE.
QDV5.DE tracks MSCI India, while OP6E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QDV5.DE and 0.29% for OP6E.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDV5.DE and OP6E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer