QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE
QDV5.DE (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLXT.DE (Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - QDV5.DE tracks the MSCI India while FLXT.DE tracks the FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDV5.DE returned 2.49%/yr vs 41.09%/yr for FLXT.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDV5.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXT.DE.
Performance
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDV5.DE achieves a -11.72% return, which is significantly lower than FLXT.DE's 69.39% return.
QDV5.DE
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -11.72%
- 6M
- -13.23%
- 1Y
- -14.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXT.DE
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 13.04%
- YTD
- 69.39%
- 6M
- 72.01%
- 1Y
- 113.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDV5.DE iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.72% | -7.96% | 15.56% | 14.91% | -0.89% |
FLXT.DE Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 69.39% | 19.89% | 30.42% | 25.56% | -22.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDV5.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDV5.DE
FLXT.DE
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDV5.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.78 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 12.64 | -13.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 38.64 | -40.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDV5.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 4.92 | -5.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.15 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDV5.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than FLXT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDV5.DE and FLXT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDV5.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -31.16% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.83% | -9.05% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -31.16% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.03% | -1.86% | -22.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -8.18% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 2.97% | +5.93% |
Volatility
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) is 6.04%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that QDV5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDV5.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 9.61% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 18.65% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 23.26% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 21.86% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 21.86% | -0.26% |
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDV5.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDV5.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDV5.DE nor FLXT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDV5.DE and FLXT.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QDV5.DE.
QDV5.DE tracks MSCI India, while FLXT.DE tracks FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QDV5.DE and 0.19% for FLXT.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDV5.DE and FLXT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer