QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE
QDV5.DE (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 18MK.DE (Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR) are both India Equities funds tracking the MSCI India, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDV5.DE returned 5.53%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for 18MK.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QDV5.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for 18MK.DE.
Performance
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDV5.DE achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than 18MK.DE's -5.72% return.
QDV5.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -6.84%
- 1Y
- -10.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- —
18MK.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -5.72%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- 1Y
- -10.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDV5.DE iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.17% | -8.01% | 15.55% | 14.92% | -1.74% | 35.10% | 3.45% | 10.54% | 1.36% |
18MK.DE Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR | -5.72% | -10.32% | 16.35% | 14.11% | -2.28% | 33.62% | 2.72% | 9.58% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDV5.DE and 18MK.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between QDV5.DE and 18MK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDV5.DE
18MK.DE
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR (18MK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDV5.DE | 18MK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.91 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.52 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.08 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDV5.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, roughly equal to the maximum 18MK.DE drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDV5.DE and 18MK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDV5.DE | 18MK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -42.41% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -19.67% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -29.72% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -29.72% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.25% | -21.84% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -12.07% | +3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 9.14% | -0.16% |
Volatility
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR (18MK.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that QDV5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDV5.DE | 18MK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.75% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 14.23% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 16.76% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.67% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 20.30% | +1.34% |
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDV5.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than 18MK.DE's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDV5.DE vs. 18MK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDV5.DE nor 18MK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, QDV5.DE and 18MK.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDV5.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDV5.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for 18MK.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI India. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QDV5.DE and 0.80% for 18MK.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDV5.DE and 18MK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer