QDTY vs. YETH
QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YETH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 33.68% vs -32.39% for YETH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YETH.
Performance
QDTY vs. YETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than YETH's -37.76% return.
QDTY
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YETH
- 1D
- 6.84%
- 1M
- -26.20%
- YTD
- -37.76%
- 6M
- -37.20%
- 1Y
- -32.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTY vs. YETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.10% | 12.21% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -37.76% | -21.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTY and YETH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTY vs. YETH — Risk / Return Rank
QDTY
YETH
QDTY vs. YETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.94 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | -0.55 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | -1.03 | +12.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | -0.56 | +2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | -0.55 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
QDTY vs. YETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum YETH drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and YETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -64.41% | +40.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -58.73% | +47.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -61.97% | +58.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -31.13% | +26.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 31.51% | -28.46% |
Volatility
QDTY vs. YETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 6.26%, while Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTY | YETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 17.00% | -10.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 40.48% | -27.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 58.59% | -42.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 56.22% | -30.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 56.22% | -30.09% |
QDTY vs. YETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than YETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTY vs. YETH - Dividend Comparison
QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.52%, less than YETH's 153.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 31.52% | 26.82% | 0.00% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 153.07% | 109.12% | 20.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTY and YETH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YETH has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to QDTY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs YETH's -64.41%.
On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 33.68% vs -32.39% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 33.68% return vs -32.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.
YETH has the higher dividend yield at 153.07%, compared with 31.52% for QDTY.
QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while YETH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.95% for YETH.
QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTY and YETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer