QDTY vs. YBIT
QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 39.98% vs -35.27% for YBIT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YBIT.
Performance
QDTY vs. YBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than YBIT's -24.59% return.
QDTY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTY vs. YBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.37% | 11.37% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTY and YBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTY vs. YBIT — Risk / Return Rank
QDTY
YBIT
QDTY vs. YBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | -0.98 | +3.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | -1.35 | +4.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.84 | +0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | -0.78 | +4.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | -1.43 | +14.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | -0.98 | +3.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | -0.35 | +1.21 |
Drawdowns
QDTY vs. YBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum YBIT drawdown of -45.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and YBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -45.54% | +22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -45.54% | +34.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.10% | +43.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -15.12% | +10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 24.69% | -21.67% |
Volatility
QDTY vs. YBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 3.29%, while YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 7.77% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 29.10% | -17.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 36.10% | -20.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 38.63% | -12.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 38.63% | -12.76% |
QDTY vs. YBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than YBIT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTY vs. YBIT - Dividend Comparison
QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, less than YBIT's 101.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 30.90% | 26.82% | 0.00% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTY and YBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBIT has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to QDTY (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs YBIT's -45.54%.
On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 39.98% vs -35.27% for YBIT. On fees, YBIT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 39.98% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBIT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 30.90% for QDTY.
QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while YBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.99% for YBIT.
QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTY and YBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer