PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTY vs. ULTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTY vs. ULTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than ULTY's 11.14% return.


QDTY

1D
0.06%
1M
9.62%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.71%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ULTY

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.84%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. ULTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and ULTY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.74

The correlation between QDTY and ULTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDTY vs. ULTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDTY
ULTY

Technology

53.7%
54.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
0.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
1.8%

Industrials

3.1%
9.3%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
11.7%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
8.6%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QDTY
53.7%
ULTY
54.6%

Communication Services

QDTY
15.8%
ULTY
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QDTY
12.2%
ULTY
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

QDTY
7.7%
ULTY
0.0%

Healthcare

QDTY
4.2%
ULTY
1.8%

Industrials

QDTY
3.1%
ULTY
9.3%

Utilities

QDTY
1.4%
ULTY

-

Basic Materials

QDTY
1.1%
ULTY
11.7%

Energy

QDTY
0.6%
ULTY

-

Financial Services

QDTY
0.2%
ULTY
8.6%

Real Estate

QDTY
0.1%
ULTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTY vs. ULTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. ULTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTYULTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

0.40

+2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

0.66

+2.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.08

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

0.34

+3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.27

0.67

+12.60

QDTY vs. ULTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the ULTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and ULTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTYULTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

0.40

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.17

+0.69

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. ULTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum ULTY drawdown of -26.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and ULTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTYULTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-26.85%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-24.16%

+13.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.88%

+8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-9.37%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

12.31%

-9.29%

Volatility

QDTY vs. ULTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 3.29%, while YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTYULTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.51%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

15.03%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

20.79%

-5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

26.92%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

26.92%

-1.05%

QDTY vs. ULTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTY's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTY vs. ULTY - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, less than ULTY's 114.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QDTY
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
30.90%26.82%0.00%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
114.67%142.99%111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTY and ULTY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTY has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to QDTY (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs ULTY's -26.85%.

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 39.98% vs 8.24% for ULTY. On fees, QDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 39.98% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 114.67%, compared with 30.90% for QDTY.

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ULTY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 1.14% for ULTY.

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTY and ULTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer