QDTY vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). QDTY is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 25.52% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

QDTY vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

QDTY

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 9.68%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 1Y: 25.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	11.28%	12.21%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.45

Return for Risk

QDTY vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 54
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTY	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.41	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.05	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.60	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	5.92	+1.93

QDTY vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTY	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-91.35%	+67.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.10%	-47.94%	+36.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-77.15%	+72.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-68.83%	+64.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	21.04%	-17.78%

Volatility

QDTY vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 7.90%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTY	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.90%	22.98%	-15.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	68.89%	-54.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.65%	88.51%	-70.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.13%	96.89%	-70.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.13%	96.89%	-70.76%

QDTY vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTY vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.58%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	33.58%	26.82%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTY and SBIT in my portfolio?

QDTY and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTY or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to QDTY (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, QDTY or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 25.52% for QDTY. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 7.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDTY or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 25.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTY or SBIT?

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTY or SBIT?

QDTY has the higher dividend yield at 33.58%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between QDTY and SBIT?

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.