QDTY vs. QNDX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QDTY is actively managed, while QNDX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for QNDX.

Performance

QDTY vs. QNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QDTY

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -2.22%
• 6M: 9.59%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QNDX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. QNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	-0.91%
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and QNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.94

Return for Risk

QDTY vs. QNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 49
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. QNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTY	QNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	—	—

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. QNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than QNDX's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and QNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTY	QNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-4.09%	-19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	-4.09%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-1.91%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDTY	QNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	22.37%	-4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	22.37%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.10%	22.37%	+3.73%

QDTY vs. QNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QNDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTY vs. QNDX - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.71%, while QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	34.71%	26.82%
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTY and QNDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QDTY and QNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QDTY or QNDX?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTY or QNDX?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTY or QNDX?

QDTY has the higher dividend yield at 34.71%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QDTY and QNDX?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.10% for QNDX.