QDTY vs. NAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QDTY is actively managed, while NAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 39.98% vs 18.45% for NAPR. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.

Performance

QDTY vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than NAPR's 10.51% return.

QDTY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 9.62%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 16.71%
• 1Y: 39.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.37%	11.37%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.51%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and NAPR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.80

The correlation between QDTY and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDTY vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDTY	NAPR
Technology	53.7%	50.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	8.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.1%
Industrials	3.1%	3.3%
Utilities	1.4%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.3%
Energy	0.6%	0.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QDTY vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 75
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDTY	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	4.78	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	8.66	-5.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.18	-0.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	14.95	-11.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	84.84	-71.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDTY vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDTY	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	4.78	-2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.07	-0.21

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTY	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-16.53%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.10%	-1.24%	-9.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-2.28%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	0.22%	+2.80%

Volatility

QDTY vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.10%. This indicates that QDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTY	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	1.10%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	2.82%	+8.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	3.89%	+11.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.87%	11.27%	+14.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.87%	10.61%	+15.26%

QDTY vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTY vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	30.90%	26.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTY and NAPR in my portfolio?

QDTY and NAPR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTY or NAPR?

QDTY has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to NAPR (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, QDTY or NAPR?

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 39.98% vs 18.45% for NAPR. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDTY or NAPR?

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 39.98% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTY or NAPR?

NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTY or NAPR?

QDTY has the higher dividend yield at 30.90%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.

What is the main difference between QDTY and NAPR?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.79% for NAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.