PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTY vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTY vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 9.57% return.


QDTY

1D
-2.95%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
11.90%
6M
10.72%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.99%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
9.10%
1Y
83.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and GOOY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.58

The correlation between QDTY and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTY vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDTYGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.60

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.17

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

18.36

-7.88

QDTY vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTYGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-24.40%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-16.15%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-11.86%

+8.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-6.28%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.54%

-1.40%

Volatility

QDTY vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) have volatilities of 8.42% and 8.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTYGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

8.16%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

17.72%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

23.67%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.25%

23.43%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

23.43%

+2.82%

QDTY vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTY vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.83%, less than GOOY's 52.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
52.71%41.50%36.74%7.90%
QDTY
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
31.83%26.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTY and GOOY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTY has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to GOOY (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 83.00% vs 32.82% for QDTY. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 8.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 83.00% return vs 32.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 52.71%, compared with 31.83% for QDTY.

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GOOY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTY and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer