QDTY vs. GOOY
QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 22.67% vs 64.48% for GOOY. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
QDTY vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 11.24% return.
QDTY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 22.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.20%
GOOY
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 64.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.95M | $4.53M | $7.81M | |
| $575.56K | $563.37K | $755.82K |
QDTY vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 9.56% | 12.21% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 11.24% | 56.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTY and GOOY is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between QDTY and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTY vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
QDTY
GOOY
QDTY vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDTY | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.53 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 10.51 | -4.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDTY vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTY | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -24.40% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -17.70% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -10.52% | +4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -6.46% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 5.94% | -2.41% |
Volatility
QDTY vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 7.08%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTY | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 10.30% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 20.43% | -5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 25.69% | -7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 23.89% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 23.89% | +2.17% |
QDTY vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTY vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.74%, less than GOOY's 55.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 55.09% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 35.74% | 26.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTY and GOOY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to QDTY (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 64.48% vs 22.67% for QDTY. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 64.48% return vs 22.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 55.09%, compared with 35.74% for QDTY.
QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GOOY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTY and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer