PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTY vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTY vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 13.61% return.


QDTY

1D
0.06%
1M
9.62%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.71%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.65%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
13.61%
6M
11.36%
1Y
88.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and GOOY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.60

The correlation between QDTY and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTY vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTYGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.65

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.50

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

21.08

-7.81

QDTY vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTYGOOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

3.84

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.09

-0.23

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTYGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-24.40%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-16.15%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.61%

+8.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-6.26%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.20%

-1.18%

Volatility

QDTY vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 3.29%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTYGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

6.90%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

17.19%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

23.19%

-8.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

23.31%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

23.31%

+2.56%

QDTY vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTY vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, less than GOOY's 50.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
50.99%41.50%36.74%7.90%
QDTY
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
30.90%26.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTY and GOOY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to QDTY (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 39.98% for QDTY. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 39.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 30.90% for QDTY.

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GOOY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTY and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer