QDTY vs. DBO
QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. QDTY is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 39.98% vs 80.26% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
QDTY vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
QDTY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
QDTY vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.37% | 11.37% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -12.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTY and DBO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | -0.09 |
The correlation between QDTY and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDTY vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTY
DBO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QDTY
DBO
-
Communication Services
QDTY
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
QDTY
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
QDTY
DBO
-
Healthcare
QDTY
DBO
-
Industrials
QDTY
DBO
-
Utilities
QDTY
DBO
-
Basic Materials
QDTY
DBO
-
Energy
QDTY
DBO
-
Financial Services
QDTY
DBO
Real Estate
QDTY
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTY vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
QDTY
DBO
QDTY vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.38 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.44 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | 9.02 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.34 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.02 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
QDTY vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -90.18% | +66.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -18.19% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -51.38% | +51.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -62.25% | +57.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 8.92% | -5.90% |
Volatility
QDTY vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 3.29%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 12.61% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 28.20% | -16.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 34.46% | -19.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 32.29% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 31.78% | -5.91% |
QDTY vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTY vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 30.90% | 26.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTY and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to QDTY (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 39.98% for QDTY. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 39.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.
QDTY has the higher dividend yield at 30.90%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.78% for DBO.
QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTY and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer