QDAY.NEO vs. XLK
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. QDAY.NEO is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QDAY.NEO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 30.38%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 58.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.20%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 26.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
XLK
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.69 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -38.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.41% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.39% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.22% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.83% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.53% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer