QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QDAY.NEO is traded in CAD, while TSDD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSDD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a 30.27% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's 0.38% return.

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 30.27%
• 6M: 31.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSDD

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 2.42%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: -62.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	30.27%	14.84%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	0.38%	-62.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and TSDD is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	-0.49

Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDAY.NEO	TSDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.90	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.13	—

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and TSDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDAY.NEO	TSDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.44%	-99.02%	+79.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-72.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-98.85%	+97.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-71.51%	+66.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	55.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDAY.NEO	TSDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.37%	88.99%	-64.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.37%	114.33%	-89.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.37%	114.33%	-89.96%

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.91%, more than TSDD's 8.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	14.91%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	8.55%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDAY.NEO and TSDD in my portfolio?

QDAY.NEO and TSDD have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QDAY.NEO or TSDD?

On fees, QDAY.NEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDAY.NEO or TSDD?

QDAY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.

What is the main difference between QDAY.NEO and TSDD?

QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 1.50% for TSDD.